CDC ACIP Meeting Happening Now - Steve Kirsch will Comment at 1

Diane Perlman, PhD

May 19, 2022

Open in browser

My speech at the CDC meeting today

I was selected to give a 3-minute comment at the ACIP meeting today (May 19). This is the CDC's advisory committee on vaccines. Here's what I am going to say in the Public Comments section at 1pm EDT

Steve Kirsch

May 19

You can watch it live on May 19, 2022. The purpose of the meeting is to approve the COVID booster for kids 5 to 11.

Here is the link for the agenda and the livestream.

The meeting starts at 11am Eastern time. The public comment section starts at 1pm EDT.

Sadly, my personal experience has been that my speech will not make a difference. I’m sure they will unanimously approve the booster for kids 5 to 11. I’m sure none of them will reach out to me to see the data. None of them will share their data publicly because they don’t have it. I guarantee it.

However, I learned early in life that nobody ever won a chess game by resigning. So at least I will have done my part to save the lives of our kids.

My 3 minute speech

Hi. My name is Steve Kirsch. I am executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation. I have no conflicts.

I urge you not to approve the boosters because we now have new direct observational data that shows very clearly that the vaccine is killing more kids than it saves.

But you shouldn’t take my word for it.

There is a simple “reality check” that every member of the committee should do before this vote.

And you must do this research because the CDC death data for those under 25 is not complete for any date after January 2021. And the CDC death data does not indicate suspected COVID vaccine deaths. There is no post-marketing data on this.

In short, the government has not provided you with the key data you need to make an assessment. They have assumed that the vaccines haven’t caused a single death. That simply isn’t true.

The ONLY way to get the data you need is to do your own post-marketing survey.

Fortunately, there is an easy way for you to do this and I want to share the method I used. You can copy my method or come up with your own method.

Here’s what I did….

I have hundreds of thousands of followers on social media.

I asked my followers, “Do you know any children who have died since Jan 2020? How many died from COVID? How many might have died from the vaccine?”

Recall shouldn’t be a significant bias because a child death from either COVID or the vaccine is an event that nobody forgets. So even if there is a bias towards recalling more recent events, the bias affects both options equally.

If COVID and the vaccine have the same kill rate, we’d expect to have four times as many COVID deaths reported than vaccine deaths since the time period was more than four times larger for COVID than the vaccine for this age range (29 months vs. 7 months).

If the CDC is correct that the mRNA vaccines haven’t caused any deaths, the numbers should be very lopsided with dozens of COVID deaths and 0 vaccine deaths.

What I found was the exact opposite:

There were 0 reported deaths from COVID, but there were 6 deaths that were judged to be vaccine related
All 6 deaths were unexpected and happened to previously healthy kids shortly after vaccination
In 80% of all cases, autopsies were done.

I am happy to share the details of each of these unexplained deaths with the committee so you can do your own independent investigation including viewing the autopsy reports. None of these deaths was reported to the VAERS system.

If you cannot explain the result I got, you should not approve these boosters at this time. The data I received clearly shows the vaccines are doing more harm than good in this age group. There is simply no other explanation.

It is not hard to see that for yourself if you are open minded. Do you want to see the data before you vote today?

Summary

I stayed up all night writing this. I hope it will make a difference, but I’m not optimistic. The committee members typically “tune out” during public comments. I have never seen them reference anything that is said during the public comment period. But at least I tried.

I know that the chair is listening because she stopped me when I insulted the committee in an earlier appearance. But she ignores everything I say otherwise.

If you like what I’m doing, please consider becoming a paying subscriber to support my work. Thanks.

Subscribe now

Comment

Thanks for subscribing to Steve Kirsch's newsletter. This post is public, so feel free to share it.

Share

Political Therapy

Discussion about this post