The meme which a close family member keeps pushing and never ceases reminding me is that its a “Novel” coronavirus. The “novel” prefix somehow makes it more deadly. I thought ALL new ‘flu strains were “novel”? And does that fact that it’s novel give it some sort of enhanced superpowers? The only novel connotations I can see is that the who COVID hoax is the sort of fiction you’d come across in a good novel.
Thanks - you are thinking along the lines we need to. No doubt the term "novel" was intentional and paid for. There are many uses of this - if it is novel we can have novel policies, like lockdowns that we didn't have before. I welcome other thoughts.
Remember, this is a global phenomenon. In Japan it is called “Shinagata corona virus” or “new type corona virus”. While “different” in Japanese can certainly have a similar affect as “novel” in English, I am not sure that “new” does. Creat ai ly not in all applications. They use “New normal” in their pronunciation of English and not their native language to talk about the changes brought about by the panicked response to the virus.
What's "novel", is the manufacture of a combination of deadly pathogens into this particular "virus" and its resulting high infectivity in humans, ie its "enhanced superpowers", via gain of function "research", coupled with the systematic brainwashing of the general population for DECADES! So, I'd say that your close family member is not "wrong"... except in their assumptions of how to deal with this threat.
Does anyone who applies critical thinking, still believe this "virus" is a naturally occurring phenomenon?
To me, it has never been about the virus. I told a now former friend two years ago that the virus does not worry me but what would be done because of it terrified me. My worst fears were surpassed 18 months ago.
Spikeshot is good. And the term spiked is particularly powerful here. A spiked drink is one that has had alcohol added without awareness or permission, so we bring in this idea of a violation of consent as we remind people that the spike protein is being introduced. Nice work! Thank you.
I rather like Quackzine but Spikeshot works for me too. I was using the Jab or the Shot in my conversations and with like minded folks: bio weapon poison jabs!
I like hackxxine a lot and tried using it. Some of the general non elite public may not know what it means, and also there isa whole new field of bio-hacking like Josh Axe which is a positive thing - so very good, appreciate your proposal. Spikeshot fits more criteria -
I have found this as a rare individual that hasn't succumbed to any fearmongering vaccine sales pitch. Personally I'd rather take my chances with the natural biology having a million years of proven test results.
I would have thought spikeshot was a good contender before, but then Moderna went and called their injection Spikevax! I thought it was a joke at first. They don't even try to hide it. So I'm not sure spikeshot will be terribly effective given that they have embraced the term itself and neutered its impact.
I think clot shot is still pretty compelling given that it immediately conjures up the potentially deadly effects of getting injected. The framing is more effective when it points to the lethal outcome rather than the cause, which requires another mental step to connect it to your own mortality.
I don't disagree but I don't want to terrify all the people who got it - including many who got placebos or better batches. There is enough fear. Spike is just a physical description, more neutral seeming.
Placebos and "better batches"? Has anyone anywhere got evidence of these? I've looked at Craig Paardakaur (apologies for misspelling his surname!) Brilliant work on the different batches, albeit hurriedly, but I didn't see any confirmation of placebos in use. I think "better batches" is misleading. Implying that these things have better versions, means it's just a matter of reconfiguring them in the future. If it has the spike, it's doing damage. The end. How the individual reacts or handles the damage is dependent on their innate vitality. But judging by the autopsies done by Bhakti et al and pathology work by Dr Cole, it's over 90% show epithelial damage, micro clotting, etc.
Not trying to be belligerent or anything, if anyone has any evidence of some people getting placebos, please let me know. I would LOVE to know that some (perhaps even my dearest) have a chance of missing out on having their life expectancy cut short without their consent.
I appreciate the question. I think Michael Yeadon has. I have not looked into ti deeply, they say most deaths and injuries are associated with certain batches.
The meme which a close family member keeps pushing and never ceases reminding me is that its a “Novel” coronavirus. The “novel” prefix somehow makes it more deadly. I thought ALL new ‘flu strains were “novel”? And does that fact that it’s novel give it some sort of enhanced superpowers? The only novel connotations I can see is that the who COVID hoax is the sort of fiction you’d come across in a good novel.
Thanks - you are thinking along the lines we need to. No doubt the term "novel" was intentional and paid for. There are many uses of this - if it is novel we can have novel policies, like lockdowns that we didn't have before. I welcome other thoughts.
Remember, this is a global phenomenon. In Japan it is called “Shinagata corona virus” or “new type corona virus”. While “different” in Japanese can certainly have a similar affect as “novel” in English, I am not sure that “new” does. Creat ai ly not in all applications. They use “New normal” in their pronunciation of English and not their native language to talk about the changes brought about by the panicked response to the virus.
What's "novel", is the manufacture of a combination of deadly pathogens into this particular "virus" and its resulting high infectivity in humans, ie its "enhanced superpowers", via gain of function "research", coupled with the systematic brainwashing of the general population for DECADES! So, I'd say that your close family member is not "wrong"... except in their assumptions of how to deal with this threat.
Does anyone who applies critical thinking, still believe this "virus" is a naturally occurring phenomenon?
Thanks, but even if people recognize it's from the lab, most still think the spikeshots are necessary, safe and effective. They don't make the leap.
True.
People are rendered oblivious by lies, to what would otherwise be obvious.
To me, it has never been about the virus. I told a now former friend two years ago that the virus does not worry me but what would be done because of it terrified me. My worst fears were surpassed 18 months ago.
I completely agree. I have said the same many times over.
Spikeshot is good. And the term spiked is particularly powerful here. A spiked drink is one that has had alcohol added without awareness or permission, so we bring in this idea of a violation of consent as we remind people that the spike protein is being introduced. Nice work! Thank you.
I rather like Quackzine but Spikeshot works for me too. I was using the Jab or the Shot in my conversations and with like minded folks: bio weapon poison jabs!
I was using quaxine a lot but it may offend some doctors and Spikeshot has better usage. Thanks
Diane told me not to call it poison since that would scare people off
Good
It is a poison hacksxxxine
I like hackxxine a lot and tried using it. Some of the general non elite public may not know what it means, and also there isa whole new field of bio-hacking like Josh Axe which is a positive thing - so very good, appreciate your proposal. Spikeshot fits more criteria -
Spikeshot sounds like a good label. The whole house of cards has fallen but many refuse to see it.
Ok. I posted this to my Gettr account:
RickLarson7M
Clot shot or spike shot?
Which do you think best describes what the pharm-freak show is injecting people with now?
Spike shot describes what is actually is, clot shot is what it actually does.
Thanks, Clotting is not all it does. It does many other things in addition to clotting. Also spike has better usage.
Ok. I didn't need to know the details as I reject all injections but am still interested thanks for your posts.
I also reject injections
I have found this as a rare individual that hasn't succumbed to any fearmongering vaccine sales pitch. Personally I'd rather take my chances with the natural biology having a million years of proven test results.
Hacksxxxine is poison
I have seen it work
Poison
I believe you.
I would have thought spikeshot was a good contender before, but then Moderna went and called their injection Spikevax! I thought it was a joke at first. They don't even try to hide it. So I'm not sure spikeshot will be terribly effective given that they have embraced the term itself and neutered its impact.
I think clot shot is still pretty compelling given that it immediately conjures up the potentially deadly effects of getting injected. The framing is more effective when it points to the lethal outcome rather than the cause, which requires another mental step to connect it to your own mortality.
Sadly, one has to now add another x not just for phIsarael or physrael
But the rest of the failed world too wants another booster...death boost so another x is necessary
Hacksxxxine
Soon will be hacksxxxxxines
Eventually we can just use a number after the x
Hacksx21ine in a few more years
They won't stop
Can I buy an extra xx?
Name that jeapoardy wheel of torture
Spike protein is poison so I think it is okay to call this stuff poison
Poison now and for all your progeny later if u have any, which the poison shot prevents
I don't disagree but I don't want to terrify all the people who got it - including many who got placebos or better batches. There is enough fear. Spike is just a physical description, more neutral seeming.
There is nothing natural about the surreal environment we are now living in.
Placebos and "better batches"? Has anyone anywhere got evidence of these? I've looked at Craig Paardakaur (apologies for misspelling his surname!) Brilliant work on the different batches, albeit hurriedly, but I didn't see any confirmation of placebos in use. I think "better batches" is misleading. Implying that these things have better versions, means it's just a matter of reconfiguring them in the future. If it has the spike, it's doing damage. The end. How the individual reacts or handles the damage is dependent on their innate vitality. But judging by the autopsies done by Bhakti et al and pathology work by Dr Cole, it's over 90% show epithelial damage, micro clotting, etc.
Not trying to be belligerent or anything, if anyone has any evidence of some people getting placebos, please let me know. I would LOVE to know that some (perhaps even my dearest) have a chance of missing out on having their life expectancy cut short without their consent.
I appreciate the question. I think Michael Yeadon has. I have not looked into ti deeply, they say most deaths and injuries are associated with certain batches.