64 Comments

Diane - Excellent article! You have profound clarity about all of this, thank you!

Expand full comment

Alanna,

As usual, Diane hits the target. Have followed Diane’s postings since her excellent open letter to Rachel Maddow.

Expand full comment

The most crucial time to learn to trust our own authority is before we are cognitive. At that point learning is in the body - learning to trust that I will get what I want, learning to trust my own knowing that I know what I want, and learning to trust to initiate.

I taught school in Berkeley in the late 60's-early 70's in a school which had bussing to achieve racial equality, and in this school 4 of us had a school within the school which promoted child initiated learning as much as possible. What became clear to me then was that while the black kids came to school without much cognitive learning, they knew how to direct themselves; and the white kids had a lot of cognitive knowledge, but didn't know how to direct themselves when they finished something. And the black kids didn't care, for instance, what we thought about their paintings, while many of the white kids did. These observations were all anecdotal, but when I read Jean Liedloff's 'Continuum Concept' I gained an understanding about why this was true. Then I also understood the implications for me of having been in an incubator for 3 weeks.

Gabor Mate's new book, 'The Myth of Normal' explains it very well - the consequences of being too much in our heads and not heart connected to our own knowing, and how the culture will be affected by that.

Expand full comment

If you trust pHarma...then you are pretty much clueless at this point - degree or not!

Expand full comment

University educated refuser checking in. Hesitant implies you might consider it. No way. Health care should only be for bullet wounds and broken bones. God did not create us to require injections of any kind.

Except for the ladies and my love injections. Oops, that might have come out wrong.

Expand full comment

Thanks. Another difference I noticed among refusers is eating healthy, using preventive medicine, functional, naturopathic, regenerative medicine and our progressive friends who comply follow the medical model.

Expand full comment

Preventative medicine, equals sunshine, exercise, good food, and lots of laughs. Humor and heavy metal beat pharma every time.

Expand full comment

Agreed.

Expand full comment

Great clarity! Thanks.

I rely heavily on the street smart (empirical) wisdom of Dr. George Carlin - who 10 years ago - was riffing on how Americans were germophobic wussies: “When I was a kid we swam in NYC’s East River in raw sewage and my immune system rocks!”

https://youtu.be/X29lF43mUlo

Empirical people stand in their integrity and realize that rarely - perhaps never - does a good idea come from university.

The Asch Experiment explains a lot. The herd, school, flock, swarm survival compression algorithm- do what the guy next to you does in moments of fear - isn’t psychologically instantiated but biologically and requires courage to overcome.

Expand full comment

Agree 100% I love George Carlin and that routine Thanks for sharing and I like your term "empirical people" and will use with attribution.

Expand full comment

Why no jabs?

Dr. T Goyetche ( sp?) wrote, " I will repeat my challenge! I challenge anybody to show me a full three-phase clinical trial in which any #mRNA #vaccine technology has ever completed a three-phase clinical trial with positive results before it being accepted under #EUA (Emergency Use Authorization.) It never has. So why did the CDC, FDA , and health authorities worldwide uniformly and without question, accept a vaccine technology that never had a positive result in a three-phase clinical trial throughout the entire history of the technology? Does anyone care to answer this?"

Thank you!

Expand full comment

Good question but they seem to have gotten away with much for along time and made a ton of money. But truth is coming-out, Chickens coming home to roost.

Expand full comment

Diane, Loved your detailed posting and will carefully work through it for enlightenment. Thank you for sharing your knowledge.

Many in the population have been burned by studies, surveys, media portrayal, being mocked and categorized indiscriminately as less than intelligent. Burned, resulting in the shying away from or avoiding completely participating in surveys of any kind. Will not offer their opinion when approached for a ‘man on the street’ query, nor will they even begin an online survey, nor even pick up the phone. Some find the construct of Facebook to be so suspiciously socially detrimental and censorious as to avoid that platform altogether.

Interviewers of all stripes carefully construct their questions to elicit intentionally revealing answers not only to the questions but about the respondent. Once beginning a survey of any kind the respondent is carefully guided down the path of increasingly revealing (important to the interviewer) questions. A perceptive individual, with enough innate discernment, becomes aware of underlying intent and begins to skip perceived intrusive overtly biased questions, then perhaps even terminating responding. Even the skipped questions and the point of termination is revealing to the interviewer.

Just finished reading a study having many participating authors. Addressing only one of the many problems with the study: one of their charts citing accumulated risk. For the accumulated risk after week two they have added the risk of week one to the risk of week two. And they continue this calculation week after week. Shared with spouse this interesting set of (mis)calculations to make it readily apparent: if on week one I have 10 eggs and remove one egg because it is cracked (10%); then on week two I have 10 eggs and remove one egg because it is cracked (10%). The week 2 cumulative cracked eggs are 2 out of 20, or 10%. It is NOT the total of 10% plus 10% to equal 20%. Such a gross misrepresentation; children in grade school know numerators, denominators, fractions, decimals. Am appalled that these types of studies are not only submitted without question. Having a degree does not confer an individual with common sense. We must question everything.

Expand full comment

Yes, thanks. In college our motto was "question authority"

Expand full comment

Substack definitely helped me feel less alone during this era of insanity. People became so irrational that they had to emotionally justify so much nonsense and prescribed idiotic, undemocratic, and abusive government directives by hating on the non-compliers.

Thank you for your thoughtful writing.

Expand full comment

You are very welcome. Substack should get a Nobel Peace Prize. It has provided such a rich, safe space and community. Yes, interesting about the mental gymnastics required to explain and justify absurdities, Voltaire said if you can get people to believe absurdities you can get them to commit atrocities.

Expand full comment

I would add to the critical thinking skills perhaps a deep distrust of whatever narrative is being proffered as a routine, matter-of-course. Maybe even complete ignorance of what we're "supposed" to be thinking or feeling is now the norm among us, for lack of the normal media consumption habits. It's possible we're just not order-takers.

Expand full comment

I don’t have an advanced degree, but after years of dealing with health issues and finally realizing western medicine was not helping, but hurting, I turned to the functional medicine / holistic approach and was already “Pharma hesitant”. I also learned to tune out traditional dietary advice of low fat, fake meat, etc. Many people in the natural health movement were not going to fall for the propaganda, because we have been lied to about so many things. Most of us got here after overcoming our own health struggles and sure aren’t going to be a Guinea pig again.

Expand full comment

Me too. I noticed many refusers are life long health conscious and bring healthy dishes to put lucks, are healthy foodies, vegetarians, vegans, etc.

Expand full comment

I refused and long to help others. But as an RN, I feel like it's a losing battle. Thank you, Dr Perlman.

Expand full comment

Understood. It's a huge challenge. We all have that experience. One by one people are waking up. Eventually there will be a tipping point, I hope. We need a collective process, like a truth commission, to help people recognize what's going on

Expand full comment

Let's do it! 👊🎯💞

Expand full comment

NB This reply to Mike Vandeman posted here in error for some reason. I have left in for now but have reposted in correct position.

"Thank you for your reply. I do have mixed views on mountain biking as it gets people out in the fresh air but people will be inconsiderate to other users. I assume you mean stopping inappropriate use of the bikes. Given the states of some roads a mountain bike would be a bonus.

However, some of the worst aspects are churning up the off road paths and more extensive damage. 4x4 vehicles are far worse of course.

Vaccines come via big pharma so are the same issue. I noted that 'pharmaceutical' anagrams to 'uh a malpractice', whilst 'medication' is an anagram of 'decimation'. When big pharma is so full of malpractice it is hardly surprising that all its products are suspect.

The problem with vaccines is that people trust their doctors who are lobbied by big pharma to push the shots. And we cannot know what is in each vial as nobody tests it just beforehand. It could be saline for all we know.

My wife and I have not had vaccines for over 30 years and have not succumbed to any disease. I do however suffer from a facial palsy since 2018 due to sodium nitrite (E250) in bacon I ate. Its toxic effects are well documented."

Expand full comment

This is called "circular reasoning": "vaccines are bad be cause they are bad". You couldn't even graduate from grade school with that kind of non-reasoning. Vaccines are foreign bodies, of course, but that doesn't meanthat they are harmful. All they do is cause the body to react to something that is similar to a harmful virus, without being itself harmful. That will cause the body to be prepared to block the harmful virus when it appears. Without the vaccine, you could die from the first contact with the harmful virus. NOW do you understand?

Expand full comment

Excellent article, and it certainly fits the characteristics of all those I've interacted with during the last 3 years -- except myself, just 3 credits shy of the master's degree. But somehow an old investigative journalist-turned artist has learned to be skeptical and seen what awful things happen is you fail to question a sales pitch. Thank you, Diane.

Expand full comment

Educational level is only one dimension. Among us refusers are several investigative journalists (Sam Husseini and Max Blumenthal) and whistleblowers, Colleen Rowley, FBI & Katherine Gun (film Official Secrets) and my piece about psychology of truth tellers. People who are intuitive and see below the surface and into the future. I am writing one now about doctors with internal or external authority. Thanks for all you do, I love FLCCC and your graceful presence on Wednesday nights. The most down to earth, lovable group, doing so much good.

Expand full comment

It's irrelevant. What's important is how many (what proportion of) vaccinated people die and/or get long covid or other serious illness vs. how many un-vaccinated people die and/or get long covid or other serious illness. I'm sure that vaccinated people are better off. I've been vaccinated three times and have experienced no harm whatsoever. I just turned 80 and frequently spend a full day hiking to the woods and doing habitat restoration, as I did today. The vaccine may do some harm, but on average, I think that one is better off getting vaccinated.

But I think that you may be more inclined to listen to anti-vaxxers, so I suggest that you do your own research: find out what the last words were from anti-vaxxers who die from covid. I would expect there to be some who have the guts to admit to having made a huge mistake by not getting vaccinated (of course once you have covid, it's too late to get vaccinated). By the laws of probability I'm sure that there is at least one such person.

Voila! This is the very first result of my google search:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/covid-vaccine-antivax-alabama-family-death-b1890600.html

‘This is not a hoax’: Family reveal tragic final words of anti-vaxxer, 28, who died of Covid

Mother says her son ‘would have made sure everyone knew how serious this disease is’ after admitting it was not a conspiracy while in an ICU

Gino Spocchia

Monday 26 July 2021 15:46

84 Comments

‘Time to start blaming the unvaccinated folks’: Alabama governor hits out as Covid cases rise in state

Sign up to our Evening Headlines email for your daily guide to the latest news

I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy notice

The family of a 28-year-old anti-vaxxer who died from Covid have revealed how he regretted not getting vaccinated in his final days in an ICU unit, and admitted that it was “not a hoax”.

Curt Carpenter, of Pell City, Alabama, allegedly told his family the disease was “not a hoax” after believing in the fringe conspiracy and falling-ill in March. His mother, Christy Carpenter, also believed the virus was not real.

“It took watching my son die and me suffering the effects of Covid for us to realise we need the vaccine,” she told The Washington Post in a recent interview. “We did not get vaccinated when we had the opportunity and regret that so much now.”

Ms Carpenter said she and her son were anti-vaxxers because “it took years to create other vaccines”. The family eventually caught Covid and Curt was taken to an ICU unit in Birmingham, Alabama. He died on 2 May after 51 days on a ventilator.

“Curt thought Covid was a hoax and did not take it seriously, until he could not breathe without the oxygen,” she added in an interview the Montogomery Advertiser in Alabama. Among his last words were: “This is not a hoax, this is real.”

Recommended

Jill Biden calls on unvaccinated in Hawaii to get shots

‘Time to start blaming the unvaccinated folks’: Alabama governor hits out as Covid cases rise in state

Fauci says vaccinated Americans could be forced to wear masks again amid Delta spike

“I know that if Curt had survived, he would have made sure everyone knew how serious this disease is, and how important the vaccine is,” she added, and said it was her her “mission” to inform Alabamans of the importance of getting vaccinated against Covid.

The story, which circulated on social media at the weekend, is one of many amid a surge of Covid in Alabama and a swathe of southern Republican-leaning states where vaccinate rates are among the lowest in the whole US.

Alabama governor Kay Ivey last week told reporters in Birmingham, Alabama, that it was time “to start blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks” for a rise in infections and hospitalisations in her state.

According to the CDC, as few as 39.8 per cent of Alabamans aged 12 and older have been fully vaccinated against Covid, compared to the American average of 48.8 per cent.

Vaccine hesitancy has largely been seen among Republicans, and was to blame for the Biden administration missing a 4 July target of getting 70 per cent of adults vaccinated. Fringe conspiracies about Covid have meanwhile been spread online.

More about

anti-vaxxerAlabamaICU

Expand full comment

Thanks for taking the time to respond I have done over 3000 hours of research of a variety of sources mourned the world on a daily basis. I am happy for you that you and your family are OK. The batches of vaccines are not uniform and injuries may be 1 in 100. Most people I know are OK but others among family and friends got tinnitus, vertigo, aggressive cancers among young healthy people, a stroke, 4 men I know died suddenly for no reason, a 42 year old relative of a sudden massive heart attack 2 weeks before the birth if his 7th child. Adverse reactions are associated with specific lots.

The media defines fully vaccinated as 14 days after last shot in the series, People who react or die within 13 days (most adverse reactions are in the first 3 days) are called unvaccinated. The European Parliament challenged Pfizer who admitted they did not test for infection and transmission.

The best thing is to eat healthy, boost your immune system, keep vitamin D levels up etc. There is lots of information easily available but not on MSM.

If you are curious and want more info I will write more. Let me know and you are very fortunate that you got a good lot.

Expand full comment

Everything you say is irrelevant & not science. I notice that you didn't address any of the points I made. Not one! What we all want to know is which option is best, based on statistics, not what Ph.D.s think or what happened to your acquaintances.. You were supposed to have learned the scientific method while studying for a Ph.D. This anecdotal data is not it.

Expand full comment

This article links to a myriad of studies substantiating the ineffectiveness of and harms from the Covid 'vaccines' - Steve Kirsch’s list of nearly 100 indicators that the “safe and effective” narrative is falling apart.: https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/the-safe-and-effective-narrative?r=ez5o2&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

I doubt it. STATISTICALLY, you are better off vaccinated. Sure, there may be weird times that a seatbelt harms someone, but who cares? You are still better off wearing it.

Expand full comment

Bury your head in the sand all you want...the evidence of harm is overwhelming - '1000 papers showing the harm from Covid-19 vaccines' https://case.science/case/41

Expand full comment

"rare cases of heart inflammation". I wouldn't call that "overwhelming". Tell the truth! Getting vaccinated is far better than not getting vaccinated. Many people dying from covid are very sorry that they didn't get vaccinated. But it's then too late!

Expand full comment

The only thing relevant is that vaccines are and always have been toxic/foreign bodies. They create a response from the body so that the invading substances are neutralised and removed (hopefully).

However that is all vaccines do. It has never been a good idea to poison yourself or others in the name of good health.

But some people seem to get a kick out of playing Russian roulette with their bodies.

And big pharma make a lot of money so they and their supporters are happy.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/why-vaccines-do-not-work-in-a-nutshell

https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/

Expand full comment

Irrelevant. EVERYTING we eat or breathe is a foreign body, by definition. Who cares? STATISTICALLY, you are better off vaccinated. Sure, there may be weird times that a seatbelt harms someone, but who cares? You are still better off wearing it.

Expand full comment

Bollox. Who cares about statistics. You should know the saying, lies, damn lies and statistics, big pharma has been manipulating them for decades and decades.

As to seat belts this is a foolish comparison as we don't eat seatbelts or inject them into people do we?

Expand full comment

Thanks for your words of wisdom and for perceiving truth.

Expand full comment

Thank you Diane. I would 'like' but at the moment I click yet it doesn't work, so this will have to do!

Expand full comment

Much appreciation. Glad you appreciated it. Maybe because it's old, I don't know.

Expand full comment

What nonsense! Your Ph.D. is obviously not in a real science. (Neither is mine, but I took statistics while getting an M.A. in math at Harvard).

Expand full comment

Science is based on statistics. Not understanding statistics is like not knowing your multiplication tables. It isn't trivial. Statistics is used to keep you safe.

Expand full comment

Statistics aren't trivial agreed. I did statistics at A level, Maths and Further Maths. I may have done some as part of the economics section in my Land Management degree.

But statistics are used by governments to manipulate the populace. In 2020 and beyond it became obvious as they used them to falsify the COVID 19 threat, in reality the seasonal 'flu which they magically made almost disappear. Neil Ferguson was particularly good at it.

Statistics were not used in 2020 and beyond to keep us safe. They were manipulated to frighten people into being injected with toxic vaccines. It made for a great experiment to prove to the wise that vaccines are a Very Bad Idea.

Expand full comment

Yes, I remember it well.

Expand full comment

Nonsense. They have saved countless lives. How is that a "very bad idea"? Many people on their deathbeds wished they had been vaccinated. But it was too late. Sad. Like the Supreme Court, you are practicing medicine without a license.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jul 15, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Of course you are! Many thanks.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Mar 30, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

What is Midwit Theory? You don't need a PhD to think for yourself, thankfully.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Mar 31, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Thanks for the explanation.

Expand full comment

Perhaps different kinds of intelligence and independence experience outside the "system."

Expand full comment