Comments open — Tell the FDA what you think about COVID shots in kids under 5!
PLEASE SHARE WIDELY
Let’s flood them with comments and show them we are on to them. Let’s protect our little ones.
See below on Truly, Fully Informed Consent on Behalf of Children
FROM STAND FOR HEALTH FREEDOM
Comments open — Tell the FDA what you think about COVID shots in kids under 5!
FDA’s VRBPAC will meet June 15, 2022, to discuss expanding the EUA for Pfizer’s COVID jab to children from 6 months up to 5 years old. You can help stop this. You must tell our government what you want for your children. You can make a public comment (by name or anonymously) that will go on record for the FDA to consider as it decides on Emergency Use Authorization for COVID shots for children ages 6 months – 4 years. Comments received on or before June 7, 2022, will be provided to the committee.
This authorization would make approximately 18 million more children eligible for an experimental jab. This age group is at minimal risk for catching or passing on COVID. If a child gets infected, they are far less likely to have serious outcomes. If the FDA expands the Pfizer EUA to children as young as 5, systems are already in place to distribute the jab to our most vulnerable, and schools will increase COVID jab mandates for our children. The ultimate goal for the White House is to expand the vaccine authorization to all children and get the jab on the ACIP Vaccine Schedule. Let’s throw a monkey wrench into that plan and fill the Federal Register with the information VRBPAC should be reading!
In Solidarity,
Stand for Health Freedom
Stand for Health Freedom is a nonprofit dedicated to protecting basic human rights, constitutional rights and parental rights. We exist to educate people and for people to have the tools to educate their lawmakers.
Please support our work by making a donation today. We rely on the generosity of concerned individuals like you so that together - through education and action - we can see a cultural shift for health freedom.
Don't like these emails? Unsubscribe
Truly Informed Consent Checklist for Pfizer BioNTech Injections for Children
A “Vaccine” Injury Prevention Project, Diane Perlman, PhD
ConsciousPoliticisDC@gmail.com 202 775 0777
“... we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it.” – Professor Eric Rubin of Harvard University, testifying before FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee(VRBPAC), October 26, 2021, on myocarditis and deaths, before voting to approve.
TRULY INFORMED CONSENT CHECKLIST
Any person who gives consent to a medical procedure for themselves or their dependents must be informed of ALL the known or potential adverse effects of the treatment. If they have not been FULLY INFORMED those responsible for obtaining consent are guilty of malpractice. (Gary Kohls, MD)
1. Yes__ No __ I agree to allow my child to receive the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA injection knowing that there is no reliable safety data and that they will be participating in a medical experiment, which requires fully informed consent according to the Nuremberg Code.
2. Yes__ No __ I am informed that mRNA injections are technically not “vaccines.” They are genetic interventions never used before on humans and based on insufficient animal studies. Immunity wanes over time, does not prevent infection or transmission, and requires boosters. Impacts may be irreversible.
3. Yes__ No __ I am informed that no FDA fully approved Covid shot is available in the US.
4. Yes__ No __ I am informed that the FDA and CDC approved of the Pfizer mRNA injections to children based on an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), even though there is no emergency for children.
5. Yes__ No __ I am informed that most children who get Covid have mild symptoms, if any, and acquire superior, robust and enduring natural immunity shown to persist for many years or a lifetime and is effective against variants.T-cell tests demonstrate natural immunity whether or not there are also antibodies.
6. Yes__ No __ I am informed that about 58% with superior natural have no benefit from mRNA shots and have 3– 6 times higher risk of adverse reactions to the shots, including death.
7. Yes__ No __ I am informed that the Pfizer mRNA shots instruct the cells to manufacture spike proteins with no controls, that circulate through the body and lodge in the organs, in high concentrations in the endothelial cells, ovaries and testes, spleen, heart, and cross the blood-brain barrier.
8. Yes__ No __ I am informed that documented adverse reactions caused by mRNA shots include anaphylactic shock, allergic reactions, blood clotting, micro-clotting and other bleeding disorders, thrombosis in the brain, other thrombotic events, myocarditis, pericarditis, heart damage, stroke, tinnitus, vertigo, death, and more.
9. Yes__ No __ I am informed that if one has adverse reactions after the first shot, they must not get the second under any circumstances, and that more severe reactions and deaths occur after the second shot.
10. Yes__ No __ I am informed that mRNA shots pose an elevated risk of myocarditis, highest in young males, causing permanent heart damage and death, as well as heart attacks and strokes, including among healthy athletes. My child will be part of a medical experiment on myocarditis in this age group.
11. Yes__ No __ I am informed that some countries halted mRNA injections in children due to myocarditis.
12. Yes__ No __ I am informed that long-term effects over weeks, months, years or decades are unknown. They may include antibody dependent enhancement, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, heart problems, thrombotic conditions, prion disease and an increase in chronic diseases and reproductive harms including infertility and shortened lifespan.
Basis for approval for Emergency Use Authorization
13. Yes__ No __ I am informed that many voting committee members have financial ties to Pfizer and go through revolving doors with government agencies and lobbyists and Big Pharma, the biggest lobby, has more lobbyists than congress members. Pfizer will enormously profit from approval.
14. Yes__ No __ I am informed that “safety” studies were conducted by Pfizer and not by independent scientists. Contradictory data from independent scientists and other countries is ignored or censored.
15. Yes__ No __ I am informed that Pfizer’s studies were rushed, methodologically flawed, conducted on very few subjects, followed for a very short time, and incapable of picking up signals for adverse reactions. Pfizer controlled, cherry picked and withheld data, including elimination of subjects who had adverse reactions to the first or seconddose. Pfizer is being investigated for falsification of data, failure to investigate adverse reactions, and more.
16. Yes__ No __ I am informed that adverse reactions other than fever, chills, headaches, soreness and fatigue were not recorded and that subjects who had serious adverse reactions were eliminated from the study. Their reactions were minimized, dismissed and/or misdiagnosed as psychological or coincidences.
17. Yes__ No __ I am informed that based on studies on 5 – 17-year-olds, it is a statistical certainty that there will be adverse reactions, injuries, disabilities, trauma and deaths among 6 months – 4 year-olds.
18. Yes__ No __I am informed that this approval is necessary for Pfizer to get this shot on CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule in order avoid full legal liability for injuries and deaths.
19. Yes__ No __ I am informed that health economists estimate of the risk/benefit analysis of the Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNTV) concludes that “For every one child saved by the shot, another 117 would be killed by the shot.”
Fully Informed Consent on Behalf of Children
A Checklist for Pfizer BioNTech Injections for Ages 5 - 11
Dear School Nurse, Covid Shots for Tots are Erring on the Side of Danger
A letter you can send with a Fully Informed Consent Checklist
Expert Psychological Opinion on Harm to Children
Affidavit for Legal Case to Halt Covid Shots for Children
Informed Collusion: Enabling Mass Injections of Children
PsyOps on Moms and Pops for Giving Covid Shots to Tots
Facts to Comfort Fear-Mongered Parents
this is horrible. So many children will be sentenced to a life with unknown consequences. a future of possible suffering because of these shots.
This is an unconscionable crime, a threat to any parent, to any person to have this shot is appalling
NOTICE: EVERYONE HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK BEFORE THE FDA VACCINE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGAINST THE AUTHORIZATION OF INJECTIONS FOR 6 MONTH OLD INFANTS.
DO NOT MISS THE DEADLINE!!!
COMPLETE DETAILS:
http://OpposeTheFraud.com