I believe that Dr. Fauci should be held criminally responsible for the death of hundreds and thousands of people. His directives to doctors and hospitals for Covid patients were a death sentence in most cases. Thus we became the country with the largest number of deaths in the World. He didn't allow early treatment with known remedies and even persecuted doctors that offered it to their patients.
I just submitted this comment on Mary Trump's substack.
I disagree that Fauci is a good human. What disqualifies him, in my opinion, is his opposition to early medical treatment which could have saved so many lives. We need as many treatments as possible to reduce the public health threat of Covid-19 which doesn't seem to be controlled by vaccines alone. Peter McCullough has been publicizing effective medical treatments which have been censored by Fauci. His approach to public health is to maintain strict control over what studies can be performed, and what drugs can be authorized. They are always drugs under pharmaceutical patents--never off label drugs that have been shown to have promise. He will publish or allow to be published studies that discredit Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine--when both drugs have been used successfully to control infection in India and Africa. Both countries have lower rates of vaccination than U.S.--but much lower rates of infection. What does it cost to authorize treatment? Ivermectin is quite safe. There are a lot of randomized controlled studies and observational studies indicating its efficacy. It has just as much research behind it as Mulnupiravir--but is very inexpensive. Possibly this is why Fauci won't allow it to be given emergency use authorization. How can he be a good human being when his single minded pursuit of profit and control of medical research have caused so many deaths?
The opinions of these people are formed by a radical and fanatical belief in germ theory, and Fauci as their saviour against the onrush of the dirty, el-naturale terrain theorists. You won't win them over by making arguments within this paradigm, you have to help them see that the entire narrative is false and a psy-op.
Celia Farber has written about Fauci and AIDS/AZT... a toxic drug prescribed for people with AIDS. For years, Fauci was trying to fund a vaccine for AIDS/HIV. Fauci’s hypothesis was that all AIDS cases were caused by HIV infection, and that his agency should focus on the development of a vaccine. Unfortunately for Fauci, inconvenient data began to surface which showed that not all people with AIDS were infected with HIV. Fauci ignored a growing body of evidence showing that his hypothesis was incorrect, but would not change his mind, his focus, or the activities of his agency. But that’s not all.
AZT stands for azidothymidine, a drug originally developed as a treatment for cancer. The drug was not only ineffective for treating cancer, but almost all experimental mice treated with it died of extreme toxicity. The drug performed so badly that Burroughs-Wellcome did not even bother to patent it.
Celia Farber’s book, Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS – an exposé of the epidemic’s ethically questionable history. Inventing the AIDS Virus Hardcover – February 27, 1996 by Peter Duesberg (Author), Kary Mullis (Foreword). A pharmacist wrote to Farber: When AZT came into the store where I worked in West Los Angeles with a “Skull and Crossbones” on the package insert warning the pharmacists not to open the bottles nor touch the capsules for fear of acute poisoning, my heart sank. I had to dispense this poison and watch these young men die. Usually it took 2 to 3 months as it destroyed their bone marrow and vital organs! This became “The AIDS Epidemic” or “AIDS by Prescription” as Neville Hodgkinson wrote. https://www.davidpratt.info/aids.htm
Wow! It is amazing that he is still thought of in this light. I would respectfully suggest that Mary read Robert Kennedy’s book. Even before Robert’s book I had a less than respectful opinion of Fauci… his job is suppose to be about keeping America healthy but if you didn’t consider anything else about him and how he performs his job you have to be mindful that since he has been in this position the health of our nation is less than deplorable.
I dont understand the link between Fauci and the left or right. Should not his job performance be based on how many deaths the US has had compared to other countries in the world during the Pandemic?
I think that's a brilliant idea. As a psychologist also, I think it helps to put my psychologist hat on. Let's remember how Mary ended up sharing the financial details with an investigative journalist - it was persistence on the part of the reporter, who came to house repeatedly. I recently had to find a new PCP as my doctor retired. As I am unvaccinated, I realized that it would be helpful to seek a medical exemption but getting one from a new doc, who didn't know me, was a bit challenging. I made a plan and executed. I walked out with a medical exception and a promise not to tell anyone that he gave me one. Here's what I did: I came into his office, knowing I'd have 30 precious minutes during my first appointment to determine if we were a "good fit". I brought with me a mountain of information. I started with the petition that had been created for the Global Covid conference in Rome. I explained that I wanted to find a physician who had the same values and attitudes about medicine as I did.
He read it and said, yes, he was in agreement. I then provided the quotes from 3 editors in chief of our most prestigious medical journals which essentially described the regulatory capture of our public health agencies, research and academic institutions. I wanted him to be aware of that reality. I then provided a complete copy of the international trials on ivermectin (at that time there were 69 trials). www.ivmmeta.com
I then provided the adverse affects documents/chart on ivermectin, aspirin and tylenol and the covid vaccines. I used www.vigiaccess.org as that is the reporting record from the WHO which includes everyone in the world. At the time, cumulatively, there were less than 6,000 adverse reactions, over 40 years, on ivermectin. The Covid vaccines had over 1 Million recorded adverse effects in less than a year and half. Ivermectin even beat aspirin and tylenol. I then included the safety data studies on ivermectin - another large document. At the end, I included multiple Trial Site News reports of the "grotesque" conflicts of interest and lies that were part of the Merck story and and the FDA's involvement with the "horse dewormer". I finished up with a document from the CDC ( which has mysteriously been removed - thank God I decided to make a copy) which spoke about those with autoimmune diseases. The statement said that they recommended everyone with an autoimmune disease to be vaccinated however they needed to be aware that there was no safety data for this group. (I have an autoimmune disease.) I then requested a medical exemption from the vaccines. The doctor said, you'll have to help me fill out the form because I've never written a medical exemption for anyone before. He asked if he could keep the documents that I provided which I happily left for him.
I believe that Mary Trump may be able to be reached. I would suggest that everything get printed and mailed to her, certified mail. It allows the reader to have access to everything. I also believe the sheer mountain of data, the physical reality of the totality of evidence is important. I would be happy to talk you through this further, provide the links to the material and brainstorm a front page that would encourage her to have a look at the material.
Perhaps I missed something in your article but why build a bridge to Mary Trump? Is she on the selection committee for Person of the Week? The comments under Runner Up make me wonder what these people are drinking. Giving Rand Paul a dose of his own medicine? Fauci hasn't answered a single question by anyone in a straight forward manner. I watched a number of his press briefings, TV appearances and testimony before the Senate. He is very good at deflecting. Even his discussion around the current CDC policies are designed to CYA. No, this man has been in politics too long. Time for him to retire.
Thank you for the suggestion on making thoughtfully balanced and articulate comments showing that it's not only conservatives or Trump fans that aren't interested in these vaccines because it's not. The mainstream media doesn't seem to know that or doesn't want to since it doesn't serve their agenda.
I think it's really important for us to express and articulate in as balanced of a manner as possible in order to be able to be heard. Most people just ignore ranting unbalanced perspectives and opinions chalking it up to those "crazies" or those (---->insert your favorite adjective for "those people here _______).
We do need to bleed some of this divisiveness, anger, and hatred down so we can move forward together with the BIG work we need to do from here to try to bring balance to the global mis/disinformation and atrocities that we've experienced recently.
I believe that Dr. Fauci should be held criminally responsible for the death of hundreds and thousands of people. His directives to doctors and hospitals for Covid patients were a death sentence in most cases. Thus we became the country with the largest number of deaths in the World. He didn't allow early treatment with known remedies and even persecuted doctors that offered it to their patients.
I just submitted this comment on Mary Trump's substack.
I disagree that Fauci is a good human. What disqualifies him, in my opinion, is his opposition to early medical treatment which could have saved so many lives. We need as many treatments as possible to reduce the public health threat of Covid-19 which doesn't seem to be controlled by vaccines alone. Peter McCullough has been publicizing effective medical treatments which have been censored by Fauci. His approach to public health is to maintain strict control over what studies can be performed, and what drugs can be authorized. They are always drugs under pharmaceutical patents--never off label drugs that have been shown to have promise. He will publish or allow to be published studies that discredit Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine--when both drugs have been used successfully to control infection in India and Africa. Both countries have lower rates of vaccination than U.S.--but much lower rates of infection. What does it cost to authorize treatment? Ivermectin is quite safe. There are a lot of randomized controlled studies and observational studies indicating its efficacy. It has just as much research behind it as Mulnupiravir--but is very inexpensive. Possibly this is why Fauci won't allow it to be given emergency use authorization. How can he be a good human being when his single minded pursuit of profit and control of medical research have caused so many deaths?
The opinions of these people are formed by a radical and fanatical belief in germ theory, and Fauci as their saviour against the onrush of the dirty, el-naturale terrain theorists. You won't win them over by making arguments within this paradigm, you have to help them see that the entire narrative is false and a psy-op.
I just read a long fascinating essay that describes the betrayal of trust that Fauci is the figurehead for:
https://mellob33.substack.com/p/trust-and-betrayal-how-to-destroy
Celia Farber has written about Fauci and AIDS/AZT... a toxic drug prescribed for people with AIDS. For years, Fauci was trying to fund a vaccine for AIDS/HIV. Fauci’s hypothesis was that all AIDS cases were caused by HIV infection, and that his agency should focus on the development of a vaccine. Unfortunately for Fauci, inconvenient data began to surface which showed that not all people with AIDS were infected with HIV. Fauci ignored a growing body of evidence showing that his hypothesis was incorrect, but would not change his mind, his focus, or the activities of his agency. But that’s not all.
AZT stands for azidothymidine, a drug originally developed as a treatment for cancer. The drug was not only ineffective for treating cancer, but almost all experimental mice treated with it died of extreme toxicity. The drug performed so badly that Burroughs-Wellcome did not even bother to patent it.
Celia Farber’s book, Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS – an exposé of the epidemic’s ethically questionable history. Inventing the AIDS Virus Hardcover – February 27, 1996 by Peter Duesberg (Author), Kary Mullis (Foreword). A pharmacist wrote to Farber: When AZT came into the store where I worked in West Los Angeles with a “Skull and Crossbones” on the package insert warning the pharmacists not to open the bottles nor touch the capsules for fear of acute poisoning, my heart sank. I had to dispense this poison and watch these young men die. Usually it took 2 to 3 months as it destroyed their bone marrow and vital organs! This became “The AIDS Epidemic” or “AIDS by Prescription” as Neville Hodgkinson wrote. https://www.davidpratt.info/aids.htm
Wow! It is amazing that he is still thought of in this light. I would respectfully suggest that Mary read Robert Kennedy’s book. Even before Robert’s book I had a less than respectful opinion of Fauci… his job is suppose to be about keeping America healthy but if you didn’t consider anything else about him and how he performs his job you have to be mindful that since he has been in this position the health of our nation is less than deplorable.
Why not gift Mary Trump a copy of RFK Jr.'s excellent book?
I dont understand the link between Fauci and the left or right. Should not his job performance be based on how many deaths the US has had compared to other countries in the world during the Pandemic?
He is terrible at his job.
I think that's a brilliant idea. As a psychologist also, I think it helps to put my psychologist hat on. Let's remember how Mary ended up sharing the financial details with an investigative journalist - it was persistence on the part of the reporter, who came to house repeatedly. I recently had to find a new PCP as my doctor retired. As I am unvaccinated, I realized that it would be helpful to seek a medical exemption but getting one from a new doc, who didn't know me, was a bit challenging. I made a plan and executed. I walked out with a medical exception and a promise not to tell anyone that he gave me one. Here's what I did: I came into his office, knowing I'd have 30 precious minutes during my first appointment to determine if we were a "good fit". I brought with me a mountain of information. I started with the petition that had been created for the Global Covid conference in Rome. I explained that I wanted to find a physician who had the same values and attitudes about medicine as I did.
https://doctorsandscientistsdeclaration.org/
He read it and said, yes, he was in agreement. I then provided the quotes from 3 editors in chief of our most prestigious medical journals which essentially described the regulatory capture of our public health agencies, research and academic institutions. I wanted him to be aware of that reality. I then provided a complete copy of the international trials on ivermectin (at that time there were 69 trials). www.ivmmeta.com
I then provided the adverse affects documents/chart on ivermectin, aspirin and tylenol and the covid vaccines. I used www.vigiaccess.org as that is the reporting record from the WHO which includes everyone in the world. At the time, cumulatively, there were less than 6,000 adverse reactions, over 40 years, on ivermectin. The Covid vaccines had over 1 Million recorded adverse effects in less than a year and half. Ivermectin even beat aspirin and tylenol. I then included the safety data studies on ivermectin - another large document. At the end, I included multiple Trial Site News reports of the "grotesque" conflicts of interest and lies that were part of the Merck story and and the FDA's involvement with the "horse dewormer". I finished up with a document from the CDC ( which has mysteriously been removed - thank God I decided to make a copy) which spoke about those with autoimmune diseases. The statement said that they recommended everyone with an autoimmune disease to be vaccinated however they needed to be aware that there was no safety data for this group. (I have an autoimmune disease.) I then requested a medical exemption from the vaccines. The doctor said, you'll have to help me fill out the form because I've never written a medical exemption for anyone before. He asked if he could keep the documents that I provided which I happily left for him.
I believe that Mary Trump may be able to be reached. I would suggest that everything get printed and mailed to her, certified mail. It allows the reader to have access to everything. I also believe the sheer mountain of data, the physical reality of the totality of evidence is important. I would be happy to talk you through this further, provide the links to the material and brainstorm a front page that would encourage her to have a look at the material.
Perhaps I missed something in your article but why build a bridge to Mary Trump? Is she on the selection committee for Person of the Week? The comments under Runner Up make me wonder what these people are drinking. Giving Rand Paul a dose of his own medicine? Fauci hasn't answered a single question by anyone in a straight forward manner. I watched a number of his press briefings, TV appearances and testimony before the Senate. He is very good at deflecting. Even his discussion around the current CDC policies are designed to CYA. No, this man has been in politics too long. Time for him to retire.
Thank you for the suggestion on making thoughtfully balanced and articulate comments showing that it's not only conservatives or Trump fans that aren't interested in these vaccines because it's not. The mainstream media doesn't seem to know that or doesn't want to since it doesn't serve their agenda.
I think it's really important for us to express and articulate in as balanced of a manner as possible in order to be able to be heard. Most people just ignore ranting unbalanced perspectives and opinions chalking it up to those "crazies" or those (---->insert your favorite adjective for "those people here _______).
We do need to bleed some of this divisiveness, anger, and hatred down so we can move forward together with the BIG work we need to do from here to try to bring balance to the global mis/disinformation and atrocities that we've experienced recently.
This is not about Fauci being a good human being. It is about Mary Trump being fashionable.
I would try to make those views unfashionable.
Perhaps have her listen to this, because I have no doubt that she thinks all the smart people back Fauci.
https://youtu.be/5aISPlTLbJo
"I am in the progressive activist community in DC."
What caused you to see the light?